birger wrote: > First of all, supporting multiple init systems is not something a distro > wants to do. > > It would involve forcing package maintainers to support them when getting > enough package maintainers is a problem already. > > The alternative is to create a respin with another init system and its own > builds of any software using systemd. A big task. > > And besides... Systemd is quite awesome. Especially for servers. play with > cgroups, btrfs and selinux directly in the service file and you can have > services running in your very own containers. Hmm, I guess You want advice me, to bought some strictly limited (maybe commercial) OS - and then shut up and be satisfied with I have. But this fortunately is not Linux case... Regarding cgroups/btrfs/selinux - they may be used independently of systemd. And although I think SELinux is good thing and I use it (regardless of systemd), things as cgroups and btrfs I never needed (regardless of systemd). And I not want to 'play' with, I want to foolproof system - and in my experience, systemd does not fall with (after 4+ years of 'playing'). -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
