On 04/30/15 04:52, Kevin Cummings wrote: > On 04/28/2015 04:27 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 04/28/2015 01:19 PM, foxec208@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> On my laptop the file exists but it is zero bytes in length >> I just checked again and got a response of 0, so I probably typoed the >> first time. > My Dell Laptop gives a 0, it has an Intel video chipset. > > Both of my desktop systems have nVidia chipsets in them, and both run > different versions of the nVidia proprietary drivers. They return 4099 > and 12289. > And, FWIW, here are the meanings for the various bits.... [egreshko@meimei tainted]$ ./tainted -i [bit] [bit value] [description] 0 1 A module with a non-GPL license has been loaded, this includes modules with no license. Set by modutils >= 2.4.9 and module-init-tools 1 2 A module was force loaded by insmod -f 2 4 Unsafe SMP processors: SMP with CPUs not designed for SMP 3 8 A module was forcibly unloaded from the system by rmmod -f 4 16 A hardware machine check error occurred on the system 5 32 A bad page was discovered on the system 6 64 The user has asked that the system be marked "tainted". This could be because they are running software that directly modifies the hardware, or for other reasons 7 128 The system has died 8 256 The ACPI DSDT has been overridden with one supplied by the user instead of using the one provided by the hardware 9 512 A kernel warning has occurred 10 1024 A module from drivers/staging was loaded 11 2048 The system is working around a severe firmware bug 12 4096 An out-of-tree module has been loaded 13 8192 An unsigned module has been loaded in a kernel supporting module signature 14 16384 A soft lockup has previously occurred on the system 15 32768 The kernel has been live patched For 12289 that works out to be.... [egreshko@meimei tainted]$ ./tainted Taint value: 12289 [bit] [bit value] [description] 0 1 A module with a non-GPL license has been loaded, this includes modules with no license. Set by modutils >= 2.4.9 and module-init-tools 12 4096 An out-of-tree module has been loaded 13 8192 An unsigned module has been loaded in a kernel supporting module signature -- If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org