RE: WiFi restoration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



With only ten feet away, drop of signal because of distance isn't a serious consideration.

However, what Tim wrote does: If there is another modem operation on the same frequency, it will cause interference (like the old moiré patterns from physics-class)
If they use hidden ssid, it might be a bit harder to detect, but, moving them 4 channels up/down might be helpful, just like moving to the 5GHz band:
- those signals dampens more when they travel, thus causing less interference
- on the 5GHz band, you can use consecutive channels with less problems, on 2.4 you have serious overlap.

Hw


-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim
Sent: dinsdag 28 april 2015 8:53
To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: WiFi restoration

Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception, and WiFi 
>> occasionally fails there.
>> When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
>> Re-starting NetworkManager never does the trick, however.
>> Is there any other step I could take, short of re-booting?
>> I'm running Fedora-21/KDE.

sean darcy:
> I'm about 10 feet directly across from an n wireless router. And what 
> you describe happens 2-3 times a day. Never on my wife's windows laptop.
> BTW, I don't reboot, just disconnect and reconnect.

You could be in a dead spot for wireless reception - reflections of signals around the room you're in merge and cancel out where your computer's antenna is located.  Try moving position a bit.  I can produce this sort of problem when just a couple of feet from an access point.

You could be using the same WiFi channel as a neighbour, and the clash of each others signals messes up yours.  Try changing your access point's channel.  I've had that problem, too.  Changing channels made a world of difference.  I wish the interface that shows your nearby networks that you use to pick the one you wanted showed what channels were in use, rather than having to use some other debugging tool.  It'd make setting up your wireless LANs a lot easier.

Some access points have an automatic option for them to pick which channel to use.  Mine always automatically picked the worst one to use.
Logically speaking, it'd be scanning nearby networks, and avoiding channels that are in use; or, for where they're all in use, opting to re-use the channel with the weakest signal, presuming that it was the furthest one away.  However, there's a fundamental flaw with this process - the access point can only determine best and worst channels for itself, your clients are in other locations, and which already-in-use channels are stronger and weaker, for them, will probably be a different set of channels than the access point's.

--
tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp

Linux 3.19.4-100.fc20.i686 #1 SMP Mon Apr 13 22:20:50 UTC 2015 i686

All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists.

George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments.

--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

______________________________________________________________________
Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het electronisch verzenden van berichten.

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux