On 27 March 2015 at 23:26, Pete Travis <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/27/2015 03:30 PM, Mickey wrote: >> Is this true with Linux, Fedora ? I though Secure Boot was overcome as a >> problem. >> >> >> http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2015/03/23/microsoft-may-lock-out-other-oses-with-windows-10/?intcmp=ob_article_footer_text&intcmp=obnetwork > > I'm not worried about this at all. It just says that Microsoft *might not > require* the option to allow users to disable. I don't think any OEMs are > going to love the marketing benefits of mandatory SecureBoot more than they > like the business of their large customers that don't want it for $reasons, > and they aren't going to be producing different hardware for retail and OEM > because it just doesn't make business sense to do that. Also, we have shim. > Differential pricing, if a menu option can be disabled it can be monetized. -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
