Re: Yum vs Apper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/15/2015 06:09 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
On 03/16/15 04:01, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
Yum reports that there are 121 updates needed but apper reports that
the system is up to date.  Why?
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 05:39 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
See....

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152079

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189602
It looks from bug 1189602 that apper and some other similar apps are
completely broken.  If so, this should be a top priority for getting
fixed.  In the meanwhile users should run yum frequently either via
yumex or from the console.



This is my own but:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188207

Here is where we are:

The trouble lies with PackageKit, the CLI command behind Apper. The command "pkcon" is assuming an indefinite cache age. In short it is not even checking its cache.

I have been working around this by executing:

# pkcon refresh force

every morning at startup. (Of course, $sudo pkcon refresh force is the new way to execute admin-level commands.)

Rumors began to fly that maybe the problem got fixed somewhere along the way, by accident. This is not true. This morning I waited twenty-four hours since the last refresh and didn't get an update notice. I ran the force-refresh command, and got a notice of the push of the latest version of the kernel.

Once I run that command, I get notices of updates available. I then excuse this by GUI methods, as I always did.

They're working on it, all right. They know now the PackageKit system is assuming an indefinite or infinite cache age by default. They're trying to get that default changed to 86400 second (which is to say, twenty-four hours). I don't know what's holding things up. As many of you as think you have any special pull, can go to that bug, add yourselves to the CC list, and put in your tuppence, deux centimes, zwei pfennigen, whatever.

Temlakos
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux