On 02/23/2015 05:36 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Right. And I'm still waiting to hear, what ought to be much easier than answering your questions, examples of what layout the installer won't let them create; or won't use once precreated elsewhere.
Fair enough. For the record, I don't think it does bcache devices yet. ;-) From a process and resource POV, though, it just seems like it would be nice for anaconda development to be able to step off the hampster wheel of chasing the lastest and greatest device types (and combinations thereof). If the bits are there in Fedora to support a particular storage setup, let dracut, udev, etc. do their thing and just use the block devices they set up. -- ======================================================================== Ian Pilcher arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx -------- "I grew up before Mark Zuckerberg invented friendship" -------- ======================================================================== -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
