Re: Adobe not providing linux flash updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/10/2015 11:42 AM, poma wrote:
On 09.02.2015 22:28, Fred Smith wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 08:26:42AM +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 02/04/2015 05:12 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 3 February 2015 at 23:44, Robert Moskowitz <rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
www.cnn.com is telling me that my version of flash-player is out of date
with security risks so it won't display any video news.  Go and update your
flash player.

On this F21 system I am using:

adobe-linux-x86_64.repo

which has in it:

baseurl=http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/x86_64/

yum.log shows:

Jan 19 18:08:31 Updated: flash-plugin-11.2.202.429-release.x86_64
Jan 26 08:51:24 Updated: flash-plugin-11.2.202.440-release.x86_64

So supposedly I am current to Jan 26.  But cnn is not a happy camper.  There
have been a couple other sites complaining as well. Even one that said my
version of Firefox was out of date, but that was only a warning.


Go to about:plugins in Firefox, if the displayed version of Adobe
Flash isn't *.440, try deleting
~/.mozilla/firefox/PROFILE_NAME/pluginreg.dat and refresh
about:plugins or restart Firefox.

I've hit a similar issue recently on a different website.

I just installed the 64 bit rpm for version 442 of flash I
downloaded from Adobe's website, put a symlink into
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins (the upstream version of 64 bit firefox
looks for its plugins in /usr/lib) to where the rpm placed the
plugin, remove pluginreg.dat, started firefox and issued
about:plugins which firefox says it is picking up from
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins but it says the version is 11.2.202.310
still, why is this occurring?
Seems likely that SOMEWHERE there is still a copy of the old version
that FF is finding instead of the one you want.



$ grep -A1 /libflashplayer.so pluginreg.dat

I've just booted linux after getting home from work, started firefox and checked the plugins and firefox is now showing the right version, seems that I had to reboot linux for the rpm installation and the symlinks to take effect. On reflection maybe the ldconfig cache was causing issues as this would have been refreshed with the reboot.

begin:vcard
fn:Stephen Morris
n:Morris;Stephen
email;internet:samorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux