2015-01-31 13:52 GMT+02:00 Heinz Diehl <htd+ml@xxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi, > > tried to safely bring down a crashed Fedora 21 machine today, but M-sysrq > didn't do anything. After bringing the machine up again, the logs showed > that M-sysrq functionality was disabled. After investigating further, it seemed > that only Sysrq-S (emergency save) was actually working. In /etc/sysctl.d/01-sysctl.conf, > "kernel.sysrq=1" was present. It took me nearly 30 min. to find out that systemd > has it's own sysctl definitions, gladly ignoring/overwriting /etc/sysctl.d. In > /usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-default.conf, "kernel.sysrq=16" was set, which is what crippled > full sysrq functionality. > > In addition, I'm curious what happens when the next systemd update gets pulled in. > Most probably, my manual settings will be overwritten with what systemd thinks > is good for the user.. > Processing order of files under /etc/sysctl.d/ seems to be such that files with a high number override files with a low number. If you do not want your changes to be overridden, I think it would be a good idea to pick a high number like 90 instead of 01 for the start if your config file name. -Joonas -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
