On Friday 23 January 2015 11:18:50 Tom Horsley wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 08:13:22 +0000 > > Gary Stainburn wrote: > > The problem is that security = share did *exactly* what I wanted and now > > I can't seem to achieve the same effect any other way. > > Absurd, right? There is one other way: Use user and password based > security, then make scripts for all the machines that mount the filesystems > which hard code the user and password and set them up to run at login. > > Exactly the same level of security as share :-). > > I love the way samba advertises itself as replicating windows shares > for linux, but windows hasn't made security = share go away. I don't really understand this. How would making startup scripts per PC work? My issue is that I can only connect each client to one samba share. Once I try to connect the same client to a second share is throws be out with credentials errors. I realise that going back to Fedora 16 will only give me problems down the line, but at the moment it seems as the only option - I can't go round updating 120+ PC very easily. If someone comes up with a strong argument as to why I need to re-design everything, or at least gives me some idea of how I can do it easily I can't se any alternative -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
