Allegedly, on or about 11 December 2014, Bill Davidsen sent: > Note that there is neither man page nor /usr/share/doc descriping it, > and "-?" "-h" and "--help" all fail to generate useful guidance. Why > is an undocumented executable included in fc21 at all? Wasn't there a distro that made having documentation mandatory to get something accepted for inclusion? Something in the back of my mind jumped up and told me that when I saw your post. Something tells me we'd all be a lot better if useful documentation was a prerequisite. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64 All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists. George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments. ZNQR LBH YBBX -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
