On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Lars E. Pettersson <lars@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
I unfortunately have to side with Lars (while also trying not to fuel the fire)
Because of this he-said/she-said discussion,
I dug up and read this reference/announcement for systemd.
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd.html
And from what I quickly read, it focuses on 'parallel' startup
(which I can see no other reason for, other than speeding boot time)
but on the other hand, although it talks about 'logging everything',
it didn't advertize or mention the binary approach that we now have
that many object to.
On 12/02/14 15:47, Paul W. Frields wrote:
...Well, to be frank, it was sold to solve the issue of start up time of
computers.
This is incorrect. The actual problems systemd was meant to solve
include but are not limited to:
No, it was sold to us, in the beginning, with the promise of faster boot time. I remember the often long and winding discussions on whether this materialized or not...
I unfortunately have to side with Lars (while also trying not to fuel the fire)
Because of this he-said/she-said discussion,
I dug up and read this reference/announcement for systemd.
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd.html
And from what I quickly read, it focuses on 'parallel' startup
(which I can see no other reason for, other than speeding boot time)
but on the other hand, although it talks about 'logging everything',
it didn't advertize or mention the binary approach that we now have
that many object to.
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
