On 10/24/14 17:02, Ian Malone wrote: > On 23 October 2014 22:40, Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 10/23/2014 12:40 PM, Fred Smith wrote: >>> but there are (some) 686 libs for those common 32-bit apps that need 'em. >>> Look at "yum list available | less" then search for "[356]86". >> >> There is a barebones set of 32-bit binary libraries. No development >> packages. Calling this an environment is dubious. Installing RHEL and >> expecting any 32-bit app to run will leave you disappointed. >> > Can someone point me to where the set of libraries is listed or > described to be 'barebones', otherwise it sounds like the same > situation for running a 64 bit RHEL 6 or Fedora and using 32bit apps, > which I already do in quite a lot of cases. (This is not rhetorical > sarcasm, I really would like to know for exactly that reason.) > FWIW, I have never had a problem with running 32-bit applications, on a 64 bit installs, which have been packaged correctly as they all have as dependencies the 32-bit libraries. -- If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
