Re: testing of drives!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



My tendency would be to boot the boxes from Flash or DVD and test with badblocks or fsck nondestructively obtaining a list of problems to then help decide how to proceed with each box.   You could make a Flash drive with the basic tools and scripts and then clone it to work with several drives at once.

Time consuming but comprehensive.

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 7:41 AM, bruce <badouglas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
update::

The boxes can be remotely/ssh accessed, so it would be easier if
there's a solution that could allow us to simply run software tests
over the net, to the boxes/drives that are installed/formatted if
possible!!

thanks again!!


On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:39 AM, bruce <badouglas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Morning --
>
> Got a situation where we have a number of used/older dell boxes
> running centos/fedora (should be the same process of testing the
> drives).
>
> Some of the boxes have already had the OS installed/drive
> formatted/patitioned/etc.. Some have dual drives.
>
> We realized that we should have tested each drive prior to
> installing/formatting/etc..
>
> So, now we're wondering what's the best/god way to test the drives.
>
> We'd like to put together a basic process to allow us to test the
> given drive, preferably with the drive in the box/running/formatted so
> we don't have to test the drive in a separate box!!
>
> So, any input we can get on software to use, articles to review, etc
> in order to get a stable test process to get a good idea of the health
> of our drives would be cool
>
> Issues to consider::
> -We have running drives, that are partitioned/formatted
> -we have drives in systems that we haven't started to use
>    some primary formatted/some are installed as 2nd drives
>
> we need a way to be able to test all of the drives, preferably
>  without taking the drive(s) out of a box and testing them in a separate box
>
> Concern is/are:
>  -bad sectors/blocks
>  -health of drive
>  -capacity of drive
>  -etc..
>
> we've looked into hdparam/smartctl
>
> thanks guys!
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux