Heinz thanks for reminding me about looking at certificates by clicking the padlock. I also note that they have the ability to export and so I suppose a comparison could be made through that as well.
General question - can one spoof a certificate? I suppose "man in the middle" is simply nasty.
Jd1008 the one add-on I am now considering is a cookie manager. However, I am hoping to find one that works outside the browser.
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 11:05 AM, jd1008 <jd1008@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Actually, the sites that do not support https, simply default to http.
On 08/30/2014 08:33 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 18:39 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
3. HttpToHttpsBe prepared for various things to fail, you cannot force HTTPS with
sites that are HTTP-only.
So, such sites are still browsable even with this plugin.Tell me which of the Firefox settings options will prevent redirection?
6. Redirect Cleaner - this will prevent a website you want to visit toOn some browsers, there is, or at least was, an option not to
redirect your browser to some other website you had no intention on
browsing. You will be given the manual opportunity to override the
prevention.
automatically follow redirections (you'd get a warning, and there'd be a
link to follow if you actually wanted to follow the redirection). For
various services, you're going to have to follow them, because that's
the way they made the site. Sometimes, thanks to making them obvious,
you'll find out just why some sites just never work, because you'll see
the endless redirections around in a circle to a starting point that
doesn't work.
I have not come across it. Sure would like to know that.
It does have the options to block all popups. But many websites have
learned how to get around that firefox feature, as I still get some
popups from a few web sites.I have always looked at what cookies are stored, and I only
7. No Google TrackingI question the ability to prevent that, and dislike the doubling up and
8. No Yahoo Tracking
10. TrackMeNot.
adding on of *numerous* add-ons to a browser (it makes the thing even
more buggy). While you can try dumping cookies, etc, as you go along.
They know that numerous connections are coming from your IP, some in
response to other of their own pages, so they can track you.
e.g. You've only got to see the suggestions for what you might like to
see if you browse YouTube on one computer on your network, then do more
unrelated browsing on another computer on your LAN, and see similar, or
completely the same, suggestions.
see the primary cookies of just a few sites I am currently browsing.
No other cookies are there.
You could argue that a cookie actually embeds many other cookies from
other websites, that are hosted by the site you are browsing.
You can see those when looking at all the cookies in firefox.
Just click on a cookie and it will expand to it's components.
"Dislike" does not amount to something substantial :)
It is only a preference.Prove it! I would really like to see a concrete proof of it,
Also, in Firefox Settings, be sure to NEVER allow 3rd party cookies.This is one thing that often doesn't do what you think.
in order for me to see that there are 3rd party cookies
being stored by my browser.
I know it is a tedious thing. So far I have not seen such
issues. Only problems I have really encountered is that
noscript (configured to automatically reject all _javascript_s,
unless I allow them manually). The problems I encounter
are with many websites that have objects on their pages
that are interactive - such as a search bar, or selection of
an option in a .... say sorting option of a list of items.
Such sites have javasripts that are hosted from other sites.
I have personally seen analytics of many such _javascript_s
that install malware without one's knowledge or consent.Please offer some concrete real world examples. I would love to (and need to) see that.
e.g. For most
of us, if we were browsing google.com, any attempt to handle
doubleclick.com cookies would be considered third-party (by us), and
we'd expect them to be rejected. But if a google page incorporates
content from doubleclick (such as an advert graphic), that incorporated
content can set a doubleclick cookie, and it isn't third party to
itself, so the cookie gets allowed.
Of course. But you do not define 'sensibly' in an objective way.
It's well worth going through your browser settings, and setting them
sensibly, rather than hoping some third-party add-on will sort things
out for you.
Please show real world benefits of what you consider sensible
settings.
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
