On 08/22/14 18:57, Anders Wegge Keller wrote: > On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 18:07:36 +0800 > Ed Greshko <ed.greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 08/22/14 18:05, Ed Greshko wrote: >>> A quick test shows that avidemux can edit the file. I've not checked to >>> see if some components from RPM Fusion are required. And, I've not >>> check to see if there is any loss in quality when standard defaults are >>> used to "copy" the video. >> Ooops... Just realized that avidemux-qt does come from RPM Fusion Free. > I'm not a Fedora-purist, so rpmfusion is fine. A quick check show that I > can open and convert the file to other formats. But the timestamp in the > stream is missing. It's encoded as a subtitle strem in the videofile, but I > can't get that to show. Also, what are the editing capabilities of avidemux? > If I want to assemble a complete video from several parts of the input, and > add crossfades or other transitions, captions, overlayes and so on, will > avidemux still be the proper choice? > Well, avidemux is rather rudimentary. For more advanced editing you'd probably want something like cinelerra. I've used that in the past but not sure as to its current state. I don't think there are any current builds for Fedora. -- If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
