On 08/06/2014 05:26 AM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 23:44 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Starting File System Check on
/dev/disk/by-uuid/1dc8...f055a32473b9...
[ 13.911063] systemd-fsck[368]: _/: The filesystem size (according to
the superblock) is 3587707 blocks
[ OK ] Started dracut pre-mount hook.
[ 13.919598] systemd-fsck[368]: The physical size of the device is
3548795 blocks
[ 13.937109] systemd-fsck[368]: Either the superblock or the partition
table is likely to be corrupt!
[ 13.944962] systemd-fsck[368]: _/: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck
MANUALLY.
are the cards exactly the same size? It looks as if the card you copiued
to is smaller than the one you copied from... What does fdisk -l report
for disk size for the "old" and "new" cards?
Well, yes they are different:
# fdisk -l /dev/sdb
Disk /dev/sdb: 14.7 GiB, 15720251392 bytes, 30703616 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xd42361d8
# fdisk -l /dev/sdc
Disk /dev/sdc: 14.5 GiB, 15560867840 bytes, 30392320 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xed0dd3b4
And nothing I can do about that. Seems that the size is based on
whatever fits based on quality of the chip.
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
