On Jul 28, 2014 8:09 PM, "Ian Pilcher" <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 07/28/2014 01:45 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Failing that, you could also open a redhat bugzilla bug against the
> > kernel and see if they could help you route your patch to someone who
> > can apply it upstream or at least carry it in Fedora until it's fixed
> > upstream.
>
> Past experience tells me it would simply be CLOSED UPSTREAM.
>
> --
> ========================================================================
> Ian Pilcher
My past experience is that the Fedora kernel maintainers are responsive and helpful to an appropriate degree. Good bug reports get good responses, vague or ambiguous ones get a response that helps clarify, problems where other components are involved get redirected.
If a bug gets CLOSED UPSTREAM I'd say there's a very high probability that the issue is actually under development or has already dealt with. Upstream might have dealt with the issue in a way that's different from the approach in your patch - that doesn't mean your bug is dismissed offhand or that submitting your patch isn't appreciated.
--Pete
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org