Re: Figuring out a headless server's zeroconf addr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 07/21/2014 11:25 AM, Tim wrote:
On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 10:55 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a headless system that I cannot connect to.  So I was thinking
to put a direct connection to it and my notebook.  Both ethernets
would use the zeroconf (169.254.0.0/16) addresses.  I could then use
fping
fping -g 169.254.0.0/16 And SHOULD be able to get its address, and then SSH into the box.
I was under the impression that zeroconf did some rudimentary name
resolution, and you ought to be able to connect to hostname.local
(replacing "hostname" with the actual hostname).

It'd be a bit dopey if a zero-configuration scheme required you to
configure things...

I am doing a little testing, and zeroconf does not seem to be working. I am seeing the link up light on my ethernet port. I am seeing a local-scope v6 address, but no v4 address:

p6p1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        inet6 fe80::ea9a:8fff:fe8d:7b56  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>
        ether e8:9a:8f:8d:7b:56  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 7  bytes 2130 (2.0 KiB)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 46  bytes 4948 (4.8 KiB)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

Note that it is receiving packets from the other system. It also has a local-scope ipv6 addr, but no zeroconf addr (both systems are Fedora 20).

So how do I start zeroconf? Of course on the other system, I can't do that...

So given ipv6 local-scope, how do I learn the other system's addr. Trying to figure out fping6. How do I restrict it to the desired interface?


Any other thoughts?  I can't get to the box to recable it and reboot
it (as that is the only way I can figure out for it to readdress eth0)
until this evening.
Only that:  Are you on the same network?  169.254 connections can't be
expected to be reachable outside of their own net.

Crossover cable.  Is that enough of a 'same network'?  :)

And I have considerable routing and addressing knowledge. Besides being one of the authors of rfc 1918, and worked on CIDR, here at IETF I contribute to ipv6ops and ipv6man.


--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux