On 07/16/2014 04:17 PM, Pete Travis
wrote:
So what you're saying is, Microsoft makes no money, or even loses money, on OEM installations, and hopes to make all their money on those who upgrade existing hardware from one version of Windows to another. Or maybe on advertising through the Bing search engine. If that's true, then I suggest Richard Stallman was correct and the business model of a proprietary operating system was never tenable long-range, and has come to the end of the road. Because I'm sure everyone knows that no enterprise, that has any true sense of TCO, upgrades existing hardware from one version of Windows to the next. Each succeeding version of Windows is a worse resource hog than the last, and also breaks at least one application the enterprise uses regularly. So what they do instead is wait until their version of Windows is approaching EOL, then upgrade hardware and software together. (I recently bought a new machine, moved all my apps onto it, then ended up erasing them all because the new Windows had to go through a full system refresh just to install a "vital update.") And let's see if I further have you straight: nobody's going to get a significant discount, or indeed even an insignificant discount, by buying a "bare" machine with no OS installed. Temlakos |
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org