Re: wanted: performance laptop, no windoze tax

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 7/16/2014 8:07 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
Sorry, I know this subject has been written about before.  But google shows
mostly 5 year old info.

No need to apologize for the subject because technology advances, so the answer changes for the same questions.

What are some recommendations for a relatively high performance laptop that
works well on linux, and without paying windoze tax?

This question needs to be answered relative to a triple of considerations including performance, price, and availability. Compromises among these characteristics may be necessary to make a timely, affordable choice.

If your definition of performance includes both video and data processing performance, then higher screen pixel densities, tending toward quad resolution (3840 x 2160), or closer to it, will be considered. Other similar terminology includes 4K screens or QHD+ displays. This level of hardware needs appropriate software to support it, and that means a combination of vendor video drivers, kernel performance, and scalable-resolution application support. At this moment, the optimal combination of these factors may not yet be ready to install and use on the higher-resolution laptop screens.

If your definition of performance does not require higher-definition video, then the number of candidate machines increases, their prices decrease considering their capabilities, and software development may be relatively more complete and better match the hardware capabilities. These products are available to put into service without waiting for advancements in video software development.

If price is an important consideration, you may wish to consider refurbished equipment to obtain a better performance to price ratio, and with your choice of distribution version given adequate support of each of the machine's capabilities. If your requirement is new hardware that has never been sold with a Windows license, then choices among hardware capabilities likely will be restrained among models, and price differentials may be relatively modest.


Ken

--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux