Hi
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Tom Rivers wrote:
With respect, just because there is consensus among governing entities doesn't necessarily mean that the decision is good for everyone. Consensus != Fact. History is replete with examples.
Sure but if you want to go against the consensus, you will have to do something more concrete. That is what history shows as well. The precise form of the course of action can be say rallying behind an alternative implementation and doing the work to demonstrate that it serves the needs that systemd does. So far, there are parts of systemd including logind which simply does not have any alternative that is actually maintained. One could develop such things or file bug reports against the only active implementation.
Rahul
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
