Kevin Fenzi writes:
On Sat, 05 Jul 2014 19:30:06 -0400 Sam Varshavchik <mrsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > R. G. Newbury writes: > > >> > >> That at least works up to the day systemd decides > >> no one needs rc.local and they drop support for > >> it (a day that is sure to come :-). > > > > Direct support for rc.local has already been "deprecated". > > Somewhere I read something from Lennart and it was clear that he > > has an almost religious hatred for doing things 'the old way', so > > much so that rc.local is not 'desired'. > > I got the same impression. If it worked, reliably, for decades, it's > not desired any more. I'd love a cite if you can find one... I don't know of any reason it would ever be removed. It doesn't run or do anything if you don't have an rc.local file.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978849#c6
Attachment:
pgp_MxbZCE7nF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
