poma <pomidorabelisima@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 21.06.2014 21:29, lee wrote: >> poma <pomidorabelisima@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> On 21.06.2014 10:57, lee wrote: >>>> poma <pomidorabelisima@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>> >>>>>>> # yum-config-manager --add-repo https://download.jitsi.org/jitsi/nightly/rpm/jitsi.repo >>>>>>> # yum install jitsi >>>>>> >>>>>> Shouldn't there be a package for it in the Fedora repos? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why would Fedora doubled all possible packages. >>>> >>>> Why would ppl install random untrusted packages which might work or >>>> screw up their system or create security issues rather than switch to a >>>> distribution that includes the packages they are interested in? >>> >>> Good to know how grateful you are for someone else's hard work. >> >> What does the measure of anyones' gratefulness have to do with the risks >> that may arise from installing arbitrary packages? >> > > You call packages builded by Jitsi folks "random untrusted packages which might work or > screw up their system or create security issues". > That was a "little" too much, even from you, lee. > If by chance you did not understand what you wrote, better not to comment. Well, you're the one who doesn't understand. And you're totally besides the point with everything I've seen you saying so far. -- Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug) -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
