On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 20:40 +0000, Beartooth wrote: > On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 15:28:44 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > [....] > > Do you have the bug reference? I'd rather find out before dnf leaves me > > with a non-bootable system. The reason I'm harping on about it is that > > in a thread on this list a few months back the developers didn't seem to > > think it was a bug. > > Hmmmm .... I have two oldish machines, which I took to the shop > (I don't speak hardware) because neither would finish booting. > They called me in a day or two, saying neither was worth fixing. > > They didn't say what was wrong, and I didn't think to ask. Fwiw, > I've been running yum and dnf more or less alternately since I heard of > dnf. > > Is there a site somewhere, explaining this bug, at a level I'm > likely to be able to follow? The "feature" of dnf that I complained about is that it could remove every kernel, leaving you with an unbootable system (that was said to be the situation at the time of the earlier thread) but it doesn't sound like a cause of your booting problems. Complete absence of a kernel would be more noticeable than a boot not finishing. poc -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
