On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Ed Greshko <ed.greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/26/14 15:00, Sudhir Khanger wrote: >> There is nothing glorifying in ~/.local/share/applications. You may like dead links in your application menu. I don't. I like the concept of purging everything a package installed. Any time you reinstall you will have deal with conflicts. > > So, for example, you are on a system shared with other users and the admin decides to erase firefox you want the erasure of firefox to remove all *your* firefox related data? Remembering that it is possible that users install and run their own copies of firefox within the users environment. > > Would you want the erasure of digikam to remove all photos in a users area? > > Think about it..... > > Removing a *system* application should not (dare I say must not) fiddle with user's files. That raw data is not useful for general users. Most computer users don't even know what a browser is. All important data like bookmarks and settings are already synced to the cloud. Photos have nothing to do with digiKam. They existed before digiKam and will be added after it is installed. There is a vast difference between user photos and links created the system. How an administrator wants to do things is his prerogative? In my university, probably standards for any American university, is to delete any personal data after a user logs off. You can't run executables. You can't save anything on the library, or cafeteria or computer lab's computer for that matter. -- Regards, Sudhir Khanger. sudhirkhanger.com https://github.com/donniezazen -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
