On 20 May 2014 04:50, David Benfell <benfell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In a number of distributions over a period spanning many years, removing > pulseaudio has been a first, and all too often entirely successful, means of > getting sound working. > > Pulseaudio would be exhibit A in a counterargument to a claim that "all the > distributions are doing it." > > I think it is possible for distributions to get Pulseaudio right. Sabayon > and Linux Mint seem, in my experience, to be two that have done so. But even > so, unless you have a specialized need for Pulseaudio, which apparently may > include very high-end audiophile applications, removing it seems generally > harmless. High end audiophile applications like having more than one sound source running at a time? -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
