Re: Disable whatever is cleaning /tmp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> To mandate RAM allocation in this way will take many people, including myself, by surprise.

It's been this way on Fedora for over two years
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/tmp-on-tmpfs). Most other new
distributions do it, too. From that feature page, "Solaris has been
doing this since 1994. (Much like other Unixes, too.) Debian's next
release defaults to tmpfs on /tmp, too. ArchLinux defaults to this as
well. Ubuntu has plans for their 12.10 release." There's basically no
disagreement about it among the distributions.

> 50% of RAM is a *lot* of RAM, with serious performance impacts, and I do not do this on my systems.

You know that it's not a static allocation, right? If you're only
using a few KB of /tmp, the file system is only consume a few KB. 50%
is just the absolute maximum that can be used, and it's a default
which can be controlled via mount option (or
/lib/systemd/system/tmp.mount Options=size=... with systemd).

I think you should do some investigation on how tmpfs works, and the
benefits of this configuration before jumping to incorrect
conclusions.

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:51 PM,  <benfell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Justin Brown writes:
>
>> Complaints about this
>> sort of thing are either a failure of the user or software developer
>> to keep up to date on the file system standards.
>
>
> My understanding was that file system hierarchy was supposed to be about how
> files are arranged so that they would be consistent across distributions. It
> should not be about whether we put file systems in RAM or on RAID or on any
> particular medium.
>
> To mandate RAM allocation in this way will take many people, including
> myself, by surprise. For many users, 50% of RAM is a *lot* of RAM, with
> serious performance impacts, and I do not do this on my systems.
>
>
> --
> David Benfell
> See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you do not understand the
> attachment.
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux