On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Ed Greshko <ed.greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 04/20/14 11:26, Sudhir Khanger wrote: > > Although I appreciate Dhaval commenting but response sounded like off-topic. > > Not so sure that his suggestions where that off topic. But anyway... > > > > > If I were to see any process eating CPU would have solved the problem but as far as I can see there are no obvious indicators of the problem. > > I hope you don't think people should assume what work you have and have not done. I hope you don't assume your experience level is well known by everyone here. Sometimes it is helpful to have others look at what you've tried. Many times on this list I've watched and laughed at folks who blow off others and don't answer queries simply because they didn't think it relevant only to have it turn out to be so. > > > > > When I boot into command line (by disabling display manager) it seems to work fine. KDE with kernel 3.11.10 works fine. And kernel 3.13.8 and 9 won't boot at all but kernel 3.13.10 might boot from time to time. > > To me, all of what you said is confusing.... > > When you boot into level 3 it seems to work fine. Are you saying it works fine for all kernels or only 3.11.10? And, does it continue to work fine if you do "startkde" or does the problem show itself when you switch to graphics (KDE) mode? > > What does "won't boot at all" mean? You get a kernel ooops? It gets stuck? Blank screen? Have you tried booting with rhgb quiet removed to see if any errors are reported? > > In your bugzilla I see the lines in one of your attachment.... > > Apr 09 17:21:14 fedora thinkfan[586]: WARNING: Using default fan control in /proc/acpi/ibm/fan. > Apr 09 17:21:14 fedora thinkfan[586]: WARNING: You're using simple temperature limits without correction values, and your fan will only start at 55 °C. This can be dangerous for your hard drive. > > Have you considered looking into that? > > Additionally, what does " lsmod | grep acpi" show? Curious to see if thinkpad_acpi is being loaded. > > > > > Fleeing to another distribution is a sign of uber desperation and not threat as you say. It's morning here and I am troubleshooting my system instead of getting my work down. > > And it is Sunday or Saturday night and many *volunteers* are still sleeping or still having other fun. Sorry to hear you're troubleshooting your system and haven't gotten any work done since 4/8 when you filed the bugzilla. I still see no point in telling folks you're going to be "forced" to flee to another distro. > > -- > Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts > -- > users mailing list > users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org I booted into runlevel 3 and saw system being flooded with nouveau errors. Here is a screenshot http://i.imgur.com/qET8Zxrl.jpg nouveau W[ PFIFO][1000 and more numbers. I can boot fine with any kernel with nomodeset. I can boot fine with any kernel with Nvidia Card disabled in bios. Nouveau floods all three upgraded kernels 3.13.8/9/10. Sudhir. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org