On 10.04.2014 22:24, Ambrogio De Lorenzo wrote:
> Hi Poma,
> Il giorno gio, 10/04/2014 alle 22.13 +0200, poma ha scritto:
>
>> 1. Do not duplicate the thread - Ambrogio!
> I'm sorry for that, I didn't thought to the duplicating, because I
> thought that the problem was more complex, due to other issue on
> LibreOffice, after the same upgrade.
>
>> 2. # yum remove biosdevname
> I can't understand why, with the same biosdevname, simply booting with
> the previous kernel udev works well.
>
> I have a rule in 70-persistent-net.rules
> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="b8:88:e3:fa:2f:65", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"
> It's possible that the kernel provide the network card with different
> ATTR, and I have to read and understand better some docs about udev.
>
>> 3. Read with understanding what is written on the given link.
> You are right, before to remove the biosdevname package, my only convern
> is related to eth0.
> I can survive to every other naming convention but eth0 because I'm
> nostalgic ;-)
>
> Bye
> Ambrogio
>
Within the systemd/udev the biosdevname is redundant.
Nostalgia = Game over, choose recommended ifnames.
poma
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
