On 2 April 2014 20:09, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This summary is inaccurate. Wayland has a stable protocol and is not tied to > any specific desktop environment or deployment model. As I noted before, > GNOME [1], KDE [2], Enlightenment [3] and others have already added support > for Wayland and it is being used in phones[4] , tablets [5] etc and does not > have any specific focus on the desktop Very well. I sit corrected. May I suggest that if you feel that you have a good understanding of this area, that you write an article comparing the two and explaining the differences? I researched my answers before I posted and spent half an hour reading up on the subject; clearly I got the wrong messages from the dozen+ articles I read. I have never seen a clear, informed description of the similarities and differences of the 2 main replacements for X.11 anywhere. It is badly needed. But there are lots of docs written from the POV of one camp or the other, singing the praises of their in-house product in vague nebulous marketing-speak and damning the other. This is no use to anyone. -- Liam Proven * Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile Email: lproven@xxxxxxxxx * GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven MSN: lproven@xxxxxxxxxxx * Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 * Cell: +44 7939-087884 -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
