Re: Fedora Present and Future: a Fedora.next 2014 Update (Part I, ?"Why?")

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2 April 2014 11:16, Vikram Goyal <vikigoyal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am using fedora or rather redhat based distribution since there was
> Redhat 5 ( probably in middle ninteies or something )
>
> As far as I can tell the disk partitioning scheme under F1/20 definetly
> needs some kind of rework to make it unambigious to users.
>
> The developers must understand one thing from user's perspective that:
>
> 1} The systems being installed are mostly dual boot having other
>    OSes &/Or partitions, already having precious data in them.
>
> 2} The users are always jittery if they do not fully understand where
>    the whole thing is leading to, especially in regard to partioning.
>    So a bit of more verbosity & transparency of what exactly the
>    installer is doing will go a long way in mitigating the user's
>    complaints.
>
> 3} Developers have built the UI & know its INs & OUTs. If they try to
>    use the UI 'as a user', it will always lead to false analysis because
>    their knowledge will always warp the UI experience & they will always
>    make the right decisions even if those decisions are the most
>    difficult. So in order to understand the UI from a User's Perspective
>    they should always listen to users & give weightage to their
>    complaints because that is exactly what the UI is delivering & not
>    what the developers are thinking.
>
> But then point 3 goes for all the UI in place be it installer or full
> fledged Desktop GUI. In case of installer, it just becomes a very dicey
> from the user's point of view with so much at stake & so little
> information.
>
> Developers must understand that even if what appears to be a very dumb
> question/complaint, it actually is not dumb but just plain ambigiousness
> in UI. Confusion mostly arises from inadequate info where decision making
> is required, which is amply available with the developers but to the
> users, due to bad UI.


I entirely concur. (Personally, the oldest version I used was Red Hat
4.2 on an old SPARCstation I used to have.)

-- 
Liam Proven * Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven@xxxxxxxxx * GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven@xxxxxxxxxxx * Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 * Cell: +44 7939-087884
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux