Re: DNF vs. YUM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On 03/13/14 09:52, Tethys wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Jan Zelený <jzeleny@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
>> The metadata are quite large and downloading them every single
>> time is time consuming.
> 
> I can't think of an occasion on which I'd want to say "update this 
> package, but not to the latest version". For installing new
> software, maybe. But updating an already installed package? I'd say
> the default should be to check metadata in that instance.
> 
> Tet
> 

Comparing apt and yum is silly.  But I see the point.  I've never been
personally all that impressed with how Debian updates packages.  Fast,
maybe.  Consistent?  I have always had a real problem with .deb
packages and updating configuration files.  Invariably I have config
files that don't get updated and don't work with the new versions.
Then I have to spend precious time updating the files by hand.
Personally, yum does a much better job of that.

Making RPMs and yum more efficient is great, don't get me wrong.  But
I don't care about speed.  I typically manually run updates from the
CLI every day.  I prefer seeing the progress that way than from a GUI.
 But, I guess that comes from years of being a command line jockey.

For example, I just did a full restore of Win7 on my Samsung netbook.
 I had 82 updates to install this morning (I installed almost 200
yesterday).  It took TWO HOURS to go through the installation process
(~150MB of updates) and I still had 16 updates fail to install.  The
error code in the dialog was useless.  That is precisely why I like
updating from the CLI.

I'm sure I'm in the minority of the general population, but there it is.

- -- 
Mark Haney
Network/Systems Administrator
Practichem
W: (919) 714-8428
Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug) 3.13.4-200.fc20.x86_64
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTIbrFAAoJEM/YzwEAv6e70lMIAK1GCGnGyP3xHVXh3OEe1fUy
gEfDWMyPv0D+N7eUcAiV6kFQnvA+Tl1H4kGhvAdOnRo4K2cFKi70zoi7ro8zIkwx
A/RdPI5Knu6pLqNHyHKCnWgimSdBcwl6UTNYi6mtubC1Ys+YIqXnI02i3BQJ44tw
aHvxRfTQiVY3ItbYzIzs7RAFGvB7sAWbrE5TIc62gQf6nyEhy4GJx62OyBDbNSJf
xnyaDRkYUxMBNcOofkjIR8Njtm96Y+HFV99muiJ2cd+GXmRYXX87yCcDfxw6VBVa
aE0Gy3bjFywpBUG7j/kYMP89akSrBwQp3bCoXkNKLlKacrXGdQbgbUCaEaAVgS8=
=9rMP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux