On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 09:12:04 -0400 Mark Haney <mhaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I've been using DNF pretty regularly since upgrading to F20 and so far > I'm not sure I see any real big difference between them. Although, I > may not be supposed to see a difference. > > The one thing I have noticed is that DNF quite often shows no updates > available and YUM does. For instance today, on two F20 systems (one > at home and the other the system I'm on now) dnf update said there > were no updates but yum had 20+ on both. > > I'm curious, why is there such a big discrepancy? Aren't they both > using the same repositories? Is it an architectural change that > causes that? I know it's still in testing mode, but I would think the > output would be nearly the same. > > What gives? http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/user_faq.html#why-do-i-get-different-results-with-dnf-update-vs-yum-update kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
