On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Ed Greshko <ed.greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/05/14 18:21, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:26 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3413/gnutls-3.1.20-4.fc20 >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3363/gnutls-3.1.20-4.fc19 >>> >>> These need testing and karma. >> AFAIK 3.1.20 is not the bugfixed version. It needs to be 3.2.12, which >> is still only available for F21. >> >> poc > > So, you're saying the comments in those links are inaccurate? I'm just wondering why the version numbers don't correspond to those in the GnuTLS advisory: http://www.gnutls.org/security.html#GNUTLS-SA-2014-2 poc -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
