Le 20/02/2014 14:43, Robert P. J. Day a écrit : > is that considered good package design? it may be that there are > some packages that absolutely need some webserver feature that is > provided only by httpd, but is it also possible that some packages are > being unnecessarily restrictive? just trying to understand the > packaging philosophy here. If a package provides only some static files, it could perhaps only requires a "webserver" (except that all webserver don't use the same document root, and have different way to manage aliases). I a package provides some "httpd" configuration file, it must, of course, requires httpd. For PHP web-app, mod_php + httpd is the only working "out-of-the-box" solution. Yes it will be nice to have web-app with working configuration for all available webserver.... just a dream (for user) or a nightmare (for packager). Remi. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
