Re: vim-common conflicts with vim-minimal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/18/2014 04:12 PM, Fulko Hew wrote:


On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Max <maximilianobianco33@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:maximilianobianco33@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    On 02/18/2014 12:26 PM, Fulko Hew wrote:

        This morning (while yum install (testing my private package))
        I'm getting the error:

        file /usr/share/man/man1/vim.1.gz of
        vim-common-2:7.4.189-1.fc20.i686
          conflicts with file from package
        vim-minimal-2:7.4.027-2.fc20.i686

        Yesterday it was fine.

    Do you install and uninstall your private package on a daily basis?


Actually, I've been installing it on a minute-ly basis while I've been updating/testing its .spec file to deal with bug and changes required to update it to support
the changes in F20 (and latest Centos/RHEL).

    Did something break overnight ?

    Have you run any updates or made changes to your private package
    recently?


I reverted back to my yesterday's .spec file, and the problem remained.
P.S.  I've been testing against F20 Live KDE

For my testing today I've been erasing the vim-minimal package first,
but that shouldn't be required.

    And, whats a possible workaround?


    Don't know much about packaging specifically but I'd guess that
    both packages have a file with the same name. So a file named
    vim.1.gz already exists in that directory.It would probably be
    better to just uninstall vim then install your private package.


Its not a conflict with _my_ package, its a conflict between
one vim package and another vim package.

I see, I thought maybe you were installing your own vim package. That was how I read it at any rate. So when installing your package its not pulling in vim-common as a dependency or anything? The message just randomly pops up out of nowhere? I am confused. Like I said I don't know anything about packaging but I would like to learn.

At any rate the file is specified and evidently is being supplied by both packages as near as I can tell. So maybe the dependencies have changed for one of the vim packages. One possibly used to pull in the other during install, perhaps for the sole purpose of providing that particular file. Now the file is packaged with it and so installing the other attempts to provide the same file and error! No?

--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux