On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:44:51 -0500, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > > On 08/02/14 08:36, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> > Am I missing something? > > Yes. Why do you install an i686 library package manually like that? > > If you want the x86_64 lib, you need to specify it correctly. > Exactly, that is my question, why is it installing the i686? Because you've _not_ asked for the x86_64 lib. That one is marked differently in the packages: # repoquery --whatprovides 'libunique-1.0.so.0()(64bit)' unique-0:1.1.6-10.fc20.x86_64 # yum whatprovides 'libunique-1.0.so.0()(64bit)'Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, langpacks, refresh-packagekit unique-1.1.6-10.fc20.x86_64 : Single instance support for applications Repo : fedora Matched from: Provides : libunique-1.0.so.0()(64bit) # yum install 'libunique-1.0.so.0()(64bit)' … > Is my > command wrong, that's what the rpm shows as a missing dependency so I > just try to yum install that? Yes, it's wrong. ;-) > > Why don't you use "yum localinstall …" when installing the notecase > > package, which would let Yum resolve the dependencies for you? > > Oh, I didn't know that would be a solution, there are many things I have > to learn ... I found an x86_64 rpm on pbone.net and used that. No need to go there, since libunique is include with Fedora. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
