Re: BTRFS/Rollback & Yum Snapshot Plugin

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 30, 2014, at 6:02 PM, Jorge Fábregas <jorge.fabregas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> #btrfs subvolume list /
> ID 257 gen 102 top level 5 path root
> ID 258 gen 102 top level 5 path home
> ID 278 gen 95 top level 257 path yum_20140130172422

FYI note the top level is 257 which is root subvolume, therefore this entry is the same as saying "top level 5 path root/yum_20140130172422"

> 
> # mount -o subvolid=5 /dev/vda3 /mnt
> # btrfs subvolume delete /mnt/root
> Delete subvolume '/mnt/root'
> ERROR: cannot delete '/mnt/root' - Device or resource busy

> I believe this is happening because the snapshots are being created
> WITHIN the subvolume they're snapshotting against.  

Correct.

> Can you modify the yum plugin so that it places its
> snapshots within OTHER particular subvolume?

I think a bug should be filed. It's a bug/RFE.

Another option is to look at snapper. It uses a subvolume at the top level called .snapper that it puts snapshots into. It's in the fedora repo.


> BTW,  is there anyone out there using this plugin with btrfs?

I'm not, partly for the reason that I don't want snapshots available in the normally mounted fs because I find it a bit confusing, and also because it does as you say, it anchors root, boot, home subvolumes. Maybe I want to delete them if I get a totally messed up update that's beyond repair or my interest.

Do you know if these are read only snapshots?

btrfs sub show /home/yum_20140130172422

> p.d. I know snapshotting /home doesn't make sense at all for yum updates
> but I followed it along…

I'm not bothered by it but the purpose for snapshot-rollback of boot and root vs home are different. Maybe for /home we'd want hourly snapshots. And we'd probably never rollback /home for a bad system update. We'd keep existing home, and all of its changes since updating. And then just rollback boot and root.

And on devel@ this was discussed that perhaps finer granularity is needed than what we presently have. For example I have an additional subvolume called journald at the top level which fstab mounts as:

UUID=xxx   /var/log/journal        btrfs   subvol=journald,compress=lzo,ssd 

This is because for now I've decided I don't want snapshots having their own independent journal. I want a "master" journal kept up to date regardless of what snapshot I boot. But it may turn out this is not a good idea since the journal entries don't necessarily indicate what snapshot I've booted.



Chris Murphy

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux