Hi
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Btw, I don't know if this was at all possible, but it would have been
nice if a corrective rpm was pushed to fix all all those problems that
arose with the push of the bad selinux-related package. That would have
been really helpful beacause right now, it is impossible to tell where
the problem is with regard to a particular (seemingly unrelated)
package (such as pdfnup/pdfefit, or for that matter, flash-plugin).
Well, if a corrective update was feasible, we would have pushed one already. The problem is that the buggy update prevented future updates from happening without running the steps outlined in my announcement. Part of the recommendation was to reinstall the packages. Refer to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F20_bugs#RPM_scriptlets_fail_during_updates
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F20_bugs#RPM_scriptlets_fail_during_updates
Rahul
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
