On 01/21/14 22:49, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 21 January 2014 10:07, Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Is there some specific reason this needs to be cross-posted to three >> different lists (none of which is the Testing list)? Presumably those >> using dnf will get the update anyway. > It seems to me, Ales is damned if he does publicize the release, and > damned if he doesn't. Are you people not the same people that were > demanding exact feature parity before dnf could replace yum? The > alternative is he doesn't post these messages, you don't engage with > him and the various other people pushing dnf+hawkey; F22 comes without > yum and then everyone is angry because they weren't involved earlier. > > I don't think one of these mails has actually thanked Ales for working > on dnf, and from someone who's intimately familiar with the yum > code-base, you probably should rather than lecture him on mailing list > etiquette. > > Richard Totally agree..... It didn't trouble me in the least that the message was posted to multiple lists. I guess some folks would have been happier if Ales would have sent individual messages to each of the mailing lists. -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
