On 01/19/2014 03:03 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 02:20:06 -0500
Robert Moskowitz <rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Double nating may result in strange behaviour, depending on the
application. This should be avoided.
But sometimes cannot be avoided.
I use a router inside my isp router,
as it (isp) is not enough control,
and they can reset it remotely anytime.
No problems with this setup for 4+ years.
Then you have avoided the problems that we have documented in the IETF
on double nating. It is definity used and a lot of high cost nats work
real hard at seeing that the customer is happy. But it is unlikely that
your isp's router is in that class.
and since it has worked for you, it should continue to work for you as
long as your work stays the same.
Let us toast to the universal deployment of IPv6!
Some eon.
Read RFC 1606
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org