On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:46:26 -0500, Mark Haney wrote: > Hash: SHA1 > > On 1/17/2014 10:55 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Mark Haney <mhaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > >> > >> My question is, WTF happened? My system is pretty clean. I > >> never install packages by hand, only by either the standard > >> Fedora repos or RPMFusion. These were all Fedora repo updates, > >> FWIW. Did anyone else see this? > > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2014-January/445554.html > > > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2014-January/445555.html > > > > Geez. NEITHER of the two replies I received were useful in any > meaningful way. That's just lazy, people. If it hadn't been for > Ian's just posted message, I'd still not know WTF was going on. And > I'm seriously concerned about how an SELinux policy was released > stable with this big a problem attached to it. Please don't be so negative. The linked messages explain the issue. Nothing can be done about it anymore, since the previous selinux-policy update ought to have been offered in the updates-testing repo for a longer time. The fix is on its way into the updates repo already. Try this as long as you can still see https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-0870/selinux-policy-3.12.1-117.fc20 in updates-testing: su - setenforce 0 yum clean expire-cache yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update selinux-policy\* setenforce 1 -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
