On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 10:29:49AM +0000, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 11:10:24 +0100 > Sjoerd Mullender <sjoerd@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > It *is* a fedora problem in the sense that the OP is using Fedora. > > Sure, it's *also* an RPMfusion problem in that it causes a problem in > > the upgrade process (and as such, it should not be reported to the > > Fedora bugzilla). > > > Fedora is not responsible for upgrade problems with, > flash, skype or anything else not in fedora* .repos I understand officially (legally) that is the stance, but I always find this kind of response rather unproductive. Is Fedora a community driven distro or not? We cannot boast on that in release notes, and then on a user request for help repeat what you say above. Community repos like RPMfusion are part of the bigger Fedora community and serve a very important role. In the least, there could be a section in the FAQ, or release notes to deal with these kind of "community repo out-of-sync" problems. Confession: I did not check if such information exists; if it does, the OP can be directed there for more info. Cheers, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org