On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 23:11 +0000, Paul Smith wrote: > By uploading the VOB files, the quality of the image is better > compared to the AVI counterparts. The less you convert a file, the better it will be. Most video compression schemes are lossy (data is permanently discarded), and compressions upon compressions (video to VOB, YouTube's conversion to Flash or webm) can produce nasty artefacts. Put another in the middle, and you multiply the problem. However, it is possible that very good compression in the middle of that (i.e. one that's not very destructive to the data) may not be noticeable. Especially when you consider the small picture size that YouTube has for the video. The same goes for audio. Some YouTube clips sound like a detuning shortwave radio, played back over a chewed audio cassette from 1977. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
