On 12/19/13 21:36, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:22:14 +0000 Frank Murphy <frankly3d@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:17:46 +0100 >> Mateusz Marzantowicz <mmarzantowicz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> ownload for an upgrade if they did. >>> That just means that someone haven done his job or there was an >>> error during package rebuild which hasn't been fixed yet (correct >>> me if I'm wrong but there is something like mass rebuild in Fedora). >>> >>> Please file bugzilla report against this packages but excluding that >>> from rpmfussion. >>> >> Wrong, yum update was used (check earlier threads from op) >> yum distro-sync is your friend. > Actually not in this case. It was a clean install. > > As previously pointed out, there is nothing to be concerned about. There are cases where a package is not rebuilt to fc20. If you look at the Packages directory in the F20 DVD you'd find.... dbus-java-2.7-12.fc19.x86_64.rpm gstreamer-plugins-espeak-0.4.0-2.fc19.x86_64.rpm keybinder-0.3.0-2.fc19.x86_64.rpm liblqr-1-0.4.1-5.fc19.x86_64.rpm rubygem-therubyracer-0.11.0-2.fc19.x86_64.rpm and I would expect there to be others in the repos for things not on the DVD. -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
