Re: SSD Partitioning OP/Trim recommendations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 12/18/2013 03:09 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:

On Dec 18, 2013, at 11:50 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On 12/18/2013 01:32 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:

On Dec 18, 2013, at 6:03 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On 12/18/2013 04:41 AM, John Obaterspok wrote:
Hello,

I'm going to setup F20 with a new SSD disk (256gb Samsung 840 PRO) and was wondering about best practices for Over Provisioning during partitioning.

hmmm.  I just ordered a Crucial M500 256GB SSD for my new install.  I thought I would have it all to work with (currently using a 320GB HD, so that is a 64GB reduction already).  Are you implying here that you need to not use all of the SSD drive so that it has some swap around?

I chose the M500 over the 840 based on price and reviews.  The M500 uses MLC NAND compared to the 840 using TLC NAND.

FYI, be aware there appears to be a queued TRIM bug with the M500 where it may be causing silent data corruption. I wouldn't use discard on this, or any, SSD, in production until it's been well tested.


Seems like a workaround was posted yesterday?  So since I am still waiting for the drive to show up on my porch…

Yes. Although I'm uncertain whether we get queued TRIM "for free" with a SATA rev 3.0 controller, or if that means such drives use the SATA rev 3.0 non-queued TRIM? I'm under the impression that to get SATA rev 3.1 queued TRIM that the drive and the controller it plugs into, and libata all need to support SATA rev 3.1. So I don't actually fully understand the problem, but it sounds like a firmware bug to me. Suffice to say, with Windows having enabled TRIM by default for all SSDs, if a drive is corrupting its data, this ought to be quickly remedied with a firmware update I'd think.

My Lenovo x120e supposedly has the sata3 chipset, but only sata2 enabled.  According to a few forums that I found when looking for what type of drive to buy for this laptop.  Some think the sata2 option is to upsell the x220.

So perhaps TRIM is even less important to me.

But first I have to get f20 working reasonably on my Asus before installing on my Lenovo.  And I have to figure out a few things.  Not being able to specify the update repo at install was painful.

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux