Ed Greshko: >> It would be overly complex for google to have to determine if you've >> actually did change the subject line to then decide if it should >> remove the References: header. Joe Zeff: > How hard can it be to compare the new Subject to a copy of the old one > and not change other headers if they're identical? Programmatically, it should be easy enough to determine if the subject had changed, then behave one way or another. But harder to make a sensible judgement call about whether the subject change ought to be a thread breaker, or not... e.g. Adding [solved] ought to keep the thread. Changing topic, a bit, but still related to the prior message, ought to keep the thread. Changing topic as a dumb way of starting a new thread, ought to break threading. Much easier for subject changing to not break threading, at all. And for users to be sensible enough to actually start a completely new message when they should do. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 3.8.13-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon May 13 13:36:17 UTC 2013 x86_64 All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists. George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
