Re: Why some say "rpm elysium"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/29/2013 7:14 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 11/30/13 08:07, David wrote:
>> On 11/29/2013 7:02 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 11/30/13 07:40, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>>>> On 29/11/13 18:32, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>>>>> On 29/11/13 18:21, Steven Stern wrote:
>>>>>> So, when I reply from the gmail web interface, messages thread
>>>>>> appropriately. As do messages from thunderbird.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- -- Steve
>>>>> Those two thread with each other but not with the earlier messages with that same subject name.
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking at the source "In Reply" is different than the earlier messages.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bob
>>>>>
>>>> I should have said they do not thread with the original messages from poma and g. I didn't realize you were using stuff from AP. Nothing threads with those apparently ...
>>>>
>>> OK friends.....   I tested in the following manner to confirm what others have said.
>>>
>>> First...
>>>
>>> 1.  Copied a message, using T-Bird's functions, from my home system's inbox to gmail's inbox.  The message copied contained a References: header with 2 entries and a Message-ID: header.
>>>
>>> 2.  Used the reply function in gmail's web interface and replaced the "To:" address with my home email address and then sent it.
>>>
>>> 3.  Examined the headers of the mail received it now contains a References: header with 3 entries including the Message-ID: header info referenced in #1 and it had its own unique Message-ID:.
>>>
>>> Second I repeated the test but I used the "Edit Subject" from the drop-down but I *did not* actually edit the Subject.
>>>
>>> When I Examined the headers of the mail received it contained *no* References: header.
>>>
>>> So, to me at least, it is obvious what is being done and causing Threading Problems.  Deliberate or not, it is annoying and one would hope this bit of knowledge would help people to avoid this situation in the future and this thread will eventually expire as it should.
>>>
>>
>> Perhaps it should be reported to Google (Gmail) Ed?
>>
> 
> I don't think so.  IMO, if you're indicating that you're wanting to change the subject it is like going off on a tangent and no longer relevant to the original thread.  It would be overly complex for google to have to determine if you've actually did change the subject line to then decide if it should remove the References: header. 
> 


So, for example, how would one, legitimately , add  'Solved' to a
Subject: line and still expect it to follow the thread?

All of the time allowing Newbie and whatever. Ignoring the trolls.  :-)

-- 

  David
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux