On 10/15/2013 12:42 PM, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 12:24 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
>> *Now, the document is printed well!*
>
> Great! Now it should be possible to upgrade each of those (ghostscript,
> cups-filters, and cups) one by one to see what makes the difference.
>
> Tim.
> */
>
1. First update:
-----------------
Updating:
cups x86_64 1:1.6.4-2.fc19 updates
1.3 M
Updating for dependencies:
cups-devel x86_64 1:1.6.4-2.fc19 updates
126 k
cups-filesystem noarch 1:1.6.4-2.fc19 updates
88 k
cups-libs i686 1:1.6.4-2.fc19 updates
348 k
cups-libs x86_64 1:1.6.4-2.fc19 updates
346 k
No update for cups-filters-libs-1.0.38-2.fc19.x86_64 and
cups-filters-1.0.38-2.fc19.x86_64
*Result: Document is still printed well!*
2. Trying to update cups-filters* from updates-testing repo:
--------------------------------------------------------------
================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository
Size
================================================================================
Installing:
cups-filters x86_64 1.0.40-2.fc19 updates-testing
356 k
replacing ghostscript-cups.x86_64 9.07-15.fc19
Updating:
cups-filters-libs x86_64 1.0.40-2.fc19 updates-testing
90 k
*Result: Bad print output*
So, cups-filters... seems to be the culprit.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat)
Kernel-3.11.5-200.fc19.x86_64
Joachim Backes <joachim.backes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
