|
On 11/10/13 10:22 AM, Ralf Corsepius
wrote:
On 10/11/2013 04:02 PM, Frank wrote:
Updated my 19 installation this morning and ran into errors
again.
This is from yum's log:
Oct 11 09:42:25 psacct-6.6.1-6.fc19.i686: ts_done name in te is
usbmuxd should be psacct-6.6.1-6.fc19.i686
Oct 11 09:42:27 kernel-headers-3.11.3-201.fc19.i686: ts_done
name in te is psacct should be
kernel-headers-3.11.3-201.fc19.i686
Oct 11 09:42:28 libtar-1.2.11-25.fc19.i686: ts_done name in te
is kernel-headers should be libtar-1.2.11-25.fc19.i686
[root@localhost log]# rpm -qa | grep usbmuxd
usbmuxd-1.0.8-10.fc19.i686
usbmuxd-1.0.8-9.fc19.i686
[root@localhost log]#
*-10 is in updates-testing, not in updates, so you are mildly
cheating by telling us to be running f19 ;)
I have been known to cheat :)
I can remove rpms reference to the old usbmuxd as I encountered
similar problems a week or two ago.
Are these packaging problems or what ?
Yes, this is a packaging bug in usbmux* < *-10 [1].
*-10 fixes this bug, however as the bug is in < *-10 (which
everybody has installed), there is hardly anything we can do about
it packaging-wise.
=> upgrading to *-10 will cause everybody to hit this bug and
go through this bumpy and uneasy road.
After upgrading to *-10, try
# rpm -e --noscripts usbmuxd-1.0.8-9.fc19.i686
Yes, as I have run into the problem before that's basically what
I did and the problem is gone again
Cheers
|
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
